AFCA to name and shame firms

ASIC has approved changes to the AFCA Rules to allow the scheme to name financial firms in published determinations.

On 31 May 2019, AFCA conducted a public consultation on Rules changes to enable the scheme to name firms in determinations and received 25 submissions in response to that consultation. The regulator then applied for approval to change their Rules to enable identification of firms following public consultation.

ASIC has indicated that consumers who are party to a complaint will continue to remain anonymous in all determinations. The company regulator’s view is that naming firms in determinations can help identify conduct or market problems within firms or affecting specific products or services, as well as highlighting where firms have done the right thing. It will also enhance transparency and accountability of firms’ performance in complaints handling and of AFCA’s own decision-making.

To support the new Rules, AFCA will shortly be issuing updated operational guidelines which set out examples of the circumstances in which a determination naming a financial firm would not be published. This includes where naming may expose confidential information about a firm’s systems or policies.

ASIC has indicated that naming firms in AFCA determinations is part of a broader set of reforms aimed at increasing transparency in financial services. This includes Parliament giving ASIC power to collect and to publish internal dispute resolution (IDR) data at firm level. 

In its first six months, AFCA received 35,263 complaints. About 4,500 to 5,000 complaints are currently expected to be finalised each year by way of determination. While the publication of determinations has been a longstanding feature of the external dispute resolution schemes in Australia, the names of firms involved in financial services, superannuation and credit complaints have not been published to date.